Pollinator Protection Policy: A Timeline of US and EU Action

If you have followed news about bees over the past decade, you have probably seen the headlines come and go: a federal task force here, a European ban there, a lawsuit somewhere else. What is harder to find is the whole story laid out in order, so you can see how pollinator policy in the United States actually got to where it is today. This is that timeline.

We keep bees on Chesterhaven Beach Farm on Maryland’s Eastern Shore, so these rules are not abstract to us. They shape what gets sprayed on the fields around our hives and what protections our bees can count on. Below is a plain-language walk through the major policy moments, from the first federal acknowledgment of the problem to where things stand now.

Why pollinator policy became a national issue

For most of the twentieth century, the health of honey bees was treated as a beekeeper’s problem rather than a public one. That changed when commercial beekeepers began reporting sudden, large-scale colony losses in the mid-2000s, a pattern that came to be known as Colony Collapse Disorder. Once almond growers in California and fruit and vegetable farmers across the country realized how much of their harvest depended on healthy bees, the conversation shifted from hobby to food security.

That shift is the backdrop for everything that follows. If you want the science behind why bees are struggling, our guides to neonicotinoids and bees and the broader picture of pesticides and bees go deeper than we will here. This page is about the rules, not the chemistry.

2008: The EPA first acknowledges the risk

The regulatory story starts earlier than most people assume. In 2008, after pressure from advocacy groups, a division within the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency acknowledged that certain neonicotinoid insecticides posed potential risks to non-target species, including aquatic life. It was a quiet, technical step, but it put the issue on the federal record for the first time.

2013: Europe moves first

Europe acted before the United States did. In 2013, the European Commission severely restricted three neonicotinoids, clothianidin, imidacloprid, and thiamethoxam, on crops attractive to bees. The restriction was based on a risk assessment from the European Food Safety Authority and applied to flowering crops like maize, oilseed rape, and sunflower. It was the first major government action in the world to limit this class of pesticide specifically to protect pollinators.

That same year in the United States, the EPA introduced new labeling requirements restricting the use of certain neonicotinoid products when bees are present.

June 2014: The Presidential Memorandum

This is where the post you may have landed on originally picked up the story. On June 20, 2014, President Obama issued a memorandum titled “Creating a Federal Strategy to Promote the Health of Honey Bees and Other Pollinators.” It established an interagency Pollinator Health Task Force, co-chaired by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the EPA, and gave it a deadline to produce a national strategy.

Around the same time, the USDA committed millions of dollars in Conservation Reserve Program incentives for farmers in five Midwestern states, where more than half of commercially managed honey bees spend their summers, to establish new pollinator habitat.

May 2015: The National Pollinator Health Strategy is released

The task force delivered its work on May 19, 2015, in two documents: the National Strategy to Promote the Health of Honey Bees and Other Pollinators, and an accompanying Pollinator Research Action Plan. The strategy set three headline goals: restore honey bee colony health to sustainable levels by 2025, increase the eastern monarch butterfly population to 225 million by 2020, and restore or enhance seven million acres of pollinator habitat over five years.

It is worth being honest about the results. The monarch target was not met, and honey bee colony losses have remained high year to year. The strategy mattered less as a finish line and more as the framework that organized federal research, habitat funding, and the pesticide review process that followed.

2015 onward: Pollinator risk assessment becomes routine

One lasting change from 2015 was procedural. From that point forward, the EPA built a pollinator risk assessment into its standard pesticide registration review, both for existing chemicals and for new products seeking approval. The agency also paused approvals of most new outdoor uses of neonicotinoids until more bee-specific data could be submitted and evaluated.

2017: Protecting bees during pollination

In 2017, the EPA implemented a policy designed to protect commercial bees from pesticide spray and dust while they are under contract to pollinate a crop. The same policy encouraged individual states and tribes to develop their own pollinator protection plans tailored to local agriculture.

2018: Europe expands to a full outdoor ban

Europe went further in 2018. After a fresh review by the European Food Safety Authority, EU member states voted to ban all outdoor uses of clothianidin, imidacloprid, and thiamethoxam, allowing them only inside permanent greenhouses. A fourth neonicotinoid, thiacloprid, lost its approval in 2020. The bans have not been airtight, individual countries have repeatedly granted temporary “emergency” exemptions, but the direction of European policy has been clear.

2020: The EPA’s proposed interim decisions

In January 2020, the EPA released proposed interim decisions for five neonicotinoids: acetamiprid, clothianidin, dinotefuran, imidacloprid, and thiamethoxam. Rather than an outright ban, the U.S. approach focused on mitigation: additional protective equipment for applicators, restrictions on spraying blooming crops, new label language advising homeowners against certain uses, and cancellation of some residential turf applications.

The state-by-state patchwork

Because the federal approach has favored mitigation over prohibition, much of the sharper regulation in the United States has happened at the state level. By 2023, at least twenty states had developed pollinator protection plans or passed legislation protecting pollinator habitat, and a handful have placed direct restrictions on consumer neonicotinoid sales. The result is a patchwork: what is legal to spray, and where, can depend heavily on which state you farm in.

Where things stand now

As of 2026, the EPA continues to review the neonicotinoid class and update its risk assessments, with further registration decisions still working their way through the process. The broad picture has held steady for several years: Europe maintains a strict outdoor ban with national exemptions, the United States relies on a mix of federal mitigation and state-level rules, and the underlying question, how to balance crop protection against pollinator health, remains genuinely contested.

For beekeepers and gardeners, the practical takeaway has not changed much across all these policy cycles: the most reliable thing any of us can do is create safe forage. That is why we plant and farm the way we do, and it is the subject of our guides to planting a pollinator garden and building a backyard bee habitat. If you are new to the whole topic, our explainer on what pollination is is a good place to start.

Caring for this land and these communities is at the core of who we are. It is why we created Roots & Wings, our giving initiative that connects every purchase to something that matters. See how we give back.